We’ve attached our reel to reel tape player to a new computer terminal and we’ve noticed a problem: while the sound is recording, we can’t monitor the reel as it plays. We’re getting nix through the headphones, nothing, and no matter which sound levels we adjust, it’s still not working. After what must have been a half hour of cursing and calling on the God of Technology to blight all infernal devices, we discovered the problem: the input monitor button on the Roland Duo-Capture audio interface (a kind of mini-soundboard) hadn’t been pushed in. Stupid button.
Archive for November, 2012
Posted in Humor, tagged Darn genetics, Where can you find a contractor that's good with gingerbread? on November 27, 2012| Leave a Comment »
So I was sitting in the doctor’s office this morning while my doctor and I were going over some routine bloodwork results when he noticed a little growth on my cheek. Turned out to be a wart which he froze off using what looked like a thermos of liquid nitrogen. A very minor procedure, hardly painful, but then I started putting the pieces together: warts on face, long chin hairs, family from the Black Forest region of Germany (where the Grimm fairy tales are set)–yes, friends, I am officially turning into a witch and apparently there IS a gingerbread cottage in my near future.
Off to practice my cackling and spell-casting. Hee-hee-hee-hee-hee.
A sign next to our library’s public Internet terminals advises our patrons that these computers are for educational and research purposes only and cautions against lengthy recreational and gaming uses. “Other students need these computers, too.” Below that someone had scrawled “Satan needs it more.”
Apparently, the Internet connection to Hell is down.
Yeah, that’s right. The king (Jonathan Rhys-Meyers) commands you to return your library materials. Sticky note found on library DVD cover.
You wouldn’t expect to get important civics lessons on democracy from a long dead, absolute monarch like Henry VIII and yet that’s what four seasons of The Tudors have underlined for me. With your indulgence, gentle friends, here’s what I’ve learned from the saga of Bluff King Hal and his six wives:
- The importance of a merit system for the promotion and advancement of government officials or uneasy lie the heads that pander to the crown. One of the overwhelming take-aways from the series is the number of yes-men that Henry surrounded himself with. The surest way to rise was to cater to the king and, as the series opens, we see Henry loading titles and riches onto guys whose only accomplishment is being the king’s buddy. You might think that being the king’s BFF would set you up for life, but Henry was mercurial and more than one high-ranking courtier loses his rank, his liberty, and often his head. With such a wealth of instructive examples stuck on spikes on the Tower Wall, any noble with an ounce of sense should have stayed away, but without a merit system of appointment, the king’s favor is the only way to get close to the center of power. Lack of a professional civil service and a clear cut chain of command cripples the state as illustrated when Henry is knocked unconscious during a joust and the whole government comes to a halt.
- The (major league) importance of the separation of church and state. Henry divides his realm by insisting that personal religious belief and patriotism (loyalty to the crown) are one and the same thing. The intrusion of the church into politics and the intrusion of the state into people’s private lives leads to widespread suffering, civil unrest, and persecution.
- The importance of a system of checks and balances. Corrupt as it was, the power of the Catholic Church served as a counterweight to the power of the king. Once the power of the Catholic Church in England is broken, there is no way to check his excesses. The king’s decisions are simply rubber stamped by his Privy Council (Cabinet) and the Parliament. The end result is that there is no real rule of law. The law is simply whatever the king decides to be written or re-written and is driven by his moods and his own political considerations.
- The importance of equality for women. This series has made me re-evaluate the character of Anne Boelyn who is generally known to history as just another one of King Henry’s mistresses. Historically, even Thomas Cromwell, her political rival, described her as smart, spirited, and courageous. Yet as queen, the most powerful woman in the kingdom, Anne’s only role as far as Henry is concerned is to bear him a son and wave from the balcony. To the high spirited, intellectual Anne that must have been unbearably constraining. Had Henry spent as much time confirming his daughters to the succession instead of chasing a male heir, he could have spared himself a lot of heartbreak and his people a lot of suffering. True, England hadn’t had a female ruler since the Empress Matilda and, in fairness to Henry, he was attempting to advert another civil war, but the irony of the situation is that the British people wind up accepting the rule of his daughter, Elizabeth I, who reigns over them for 40 golden years.
- The importance of civil rights (right to peaceably assemble, right to petition government for redress of grievances, freedom of the press, etc.). When people in the North of England rise up to protest the dissolution of the de facto social service agencies in the areas (the monasteries), Henry immediately classifies them as traitors and ruthlessly supresses them. The Northerners don’t hate the king and they don’t want to de-throne him, but English commoners have no real voice in government and no legitimate way to halt policies that are doing them harm.
- The importance of the media (plays and the printing press in Tudor England) in talking about the issues of the time. Although it is only given a couple of off-hand references, one shouldn’t underestimate the role of the new technologies (e.g. plays and the printing press) in spreading new ideas and reinforcing government policy. Government-sponsored dramatic works were an easy way to communicate with a populace that still had a strong oral tradition. The other advantage of plays was that they operated on a more emotional, less intellectual basis. The printing press enabled books and pamphlets to be turned out more quickly and in greater quantities. That meant, for example, that sufficiently educated people could now read the Bible in their own language and draw their own conclusions about the text.
- The importance of the rule of by, of, and for the common people. Was there ever a group that felt more entitled than Henry and his nobles? And were there ever a people so hard done by as the British under his rule? Throughout the series, we see commoners suffering greatly from lack of care, lack of justice, and just a general lack of competent governance while Henry and the rest of the Tudor aristocracy simply don’t give two finger snaps.
So, if you are feeling down in the dumps about our democracy, go ahead and watch The Tudors. I guarantee you’ll be appreciating your basic freedoms a whole lot more–and ready to raise a rebellion against the monarchy–by the end.
In honor of both The Tudors and Halloween, I present the following music video:
Posted in Popular culture, tagged Eric Renard (NBC's Grimm), Feelin' better about our political system, James Frain, Thomas Cromwell (Showtime's The Tudors), Two thumbs way up for democracy on November 2, 2012| Leave a Comment »
My new favorite actor is James Frain who plays Capt. Renard’s half brother, Eric, on NBC’s Grimm. Frain is one of those actors that the term “charismatic” was coined to describe. He looks like just a regular Joe Actor until the cameras roll and then he tranforms into someone you can’t take your eyes off of. Kind of a British Bette Davis if Bette was English. And a guy. As a Brit, Frain gets cast in the bad guy roles on American TV. He played the psychotic vampire, Franklin Mott, in True Blood and currently has a recurring role on Grimm as Renard’s ambitious brother who is consolidating his power as he attempts to put the Renard family back on top of the heap.
In the scene above, Eric has just finished uttering the classic bad guy line “where are your friends in the Resistance now?” as his henchman conducts an “enhanced interrogation” in the sub-dungeon of the Renard Chateau against a member of the Wesen Resistance movement. Or in Royal Family terms, “insurgents who hate our freedom.” His cell phone rings–an urgent phone call from one of his operatives–and he snaps at the henchman to keep the crack of the whip/whimpering of the prisoner to a minimum while he’s trying to talk. “Chateau”, incidentally, is French for “big stinking castle”.
Jonathan Rhys-Meyers as King Henry the Eighth and James Frain as Chancellor Thomas Cromwell in Showtime’s “The Tudors.”
Because Frain is in it, I broke down and finally watched Showtime’s The Tudors. Frain plays Thomas Cromwell, a Protesant Reformer, who rises from secretary to chancellor in King Henry’s court. After watching two seasons, I’ve concluded that historically princes and kings have always engaged in rampart womanizing, obnoxious power plays, a certain amount of imprisonment, torture, and beheadings, seizing all the money and valuables they could possibly lay their hands on, rewarding their flunkies, punishing their flunkies, taking bribes, giving bribes, spying, assassination, propaganda, real politick, and assorted political corruption. So, really, the Renard brothers aren’t being bad guys as much as they are upholding the fine, centuries-old traditions of princely conduct.